Scott Polacek@@ScottPolacekIncluded Columnist IVFebruary 25, 2024
Jamie Squire/Getty Images
The Kansas City Chiefs’ capability to re-sign protective lineman Chris Jones might be the identifying consider their mission to win a 3rd straight Super Bowl, however the 2 sides apparently still need to close some ground in future agreement conversations.
“He states he wishes to retire a Chief, he ain’t going no place,” ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler stated on Sunday’s SportsCenter“Well, we’ll see. They got to pay up. We’re speaking about most likely the premier gamer in all of complimentary company. He’s just 29 years of ages still, so someone would happily pay him $25-$30 million a year, some ridiculous number. The Chiefs need to discover a method to step up however they’re preparing to talk at the end of the Scouting Combine with Jones’ representative.”
Jones made obvious that he intends on going back to the ruling champs when he shouted as much throughout the Super Bowl rally:
NFL @NFL
“I AIN’T GOING NOWHERE, BABY!” – << a href="https://twitter.com/StoneColdJones?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">> @StoneColdJones< < a href="https://t.co/qtU3Jmgq84">> pic.twitter.com/qtU3Jmgq84
Kansas City requires Jones back considering he anchors its defense as a dominant existence in the middle of the line who regularly draws double groups and makes life a lot easier for his colleagues.
He likewise produces as a three-time Super Bowl champ, five-time Pro Bowler and two-time First Team All-Pro choice.
Jones published 44 deals with, 17 deals with for loss, 15.5 sacks, 4 passes safeguarded, 2 required fumbles and one fumble healing throughout the 2022 project and after that followed with 30 takes on, 13 deals with for loss, 10.5 sacks and 4 passes safeguarded throughout the previous season.
As Fowler kept in mind, he is still at an age where he will command a considerable agreement, and other groups would undoubtedly leap at the opportunity to sign him if the Chiefs do not.
He remained Kansas City’s Week 1 loss to the Detroit Lions this previous season with an agreement holdout, however both sides would likely choose to prevent such a fate this time around.
