Including accusations of off-field misbehavior versus a gamer, the NFL’s objective is basic. Discover the truths and, if the gamer broke the Personal Conduct Policy, drop the hammer.
Regarding the brand-new claims versus previous Jaguars (now Commanders) kicker Brandon McManus, the NFL remains in a fragile area. Since the Jaguars likewise have actually been demanded stopping working to monitor McManus and stopping working to produce a safe environment on the flight to London, the group’s front-line defense will be, preferably, that McManus didn’t do anything incorrect. Having the NFL take that position off the table will make it harder for the Jaguars to win in court.
Which will it be for 345 Park Avenue? Minimize the circumstance to assist the Jaguars? Or strongly investigate/discipline McManus and damn the legal torpedoes?
There’s a sweet area in which the league discovers that McManus did it in such a way that discharges the Jaguars. That will not be simple. And the effort will be relatively apparent, if it takes place.
It’s a typical issue for companies who deal with claims since of the supposed misbehavior of particular staff members. There’s a strong temptation to circle the wagons and reject, reject, reject up until the claim is over, due to the fact that the desire to safeguard the coffers supersedes whatever policies remain in location to safeguard colleagues and 3rd parties versus misbehavior.
