HRP Communications TeamHRP Communications Team
Aug 23, 2024
NASA is moneying 11 brand-new research studies to much better comprehend how to finest support the health and efficiency of team members throughout long-duration spaceflight objectives. The recipients will finish the research studies in the world without the requirement for samples and information from astronauts.
Together, the research studies will assist determine physiological and mental reactions to physical and psychological obstacles that astronauts might experience throughout spaceflight. The jobs will deal with various spaceflight dangers connected to group efficiency, interaction, living environment, decision-making, blood circulation, and brain health. With this info, NASA will much better alleviate threats and secure astronaut health and efficiency throughout future long-duration objectives to the Moon, Mars, and beyond.
The 11 finalists were chosen from 123 propositions in action to the 2024 Human Exploration Research Opportunities readily available through the NASA Solicitation and Proposal Integrated Review and Evaluation System. Chosen propositions stem from 10 organizations, and the cumulative award amounts to about $14.6 million. The periods of the tasks vary from one to 5 years.
The following private investigators and groups were chosen:
- Katya Arquilla, University Of Colorado, Boulder, “Investigating Countermeasures for Communication Delays through the Laboratory-based Exploration Mission Analog”
- Tripp Driskell, Florida Maxima Corporation, “CADMUS (Crew Adaptive Decision Making Under Stress) and Crew Decision Support System: Development, Validation, and Proof-of-Concept”
- Christopher Jones, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, “Predicting Operationally Meaningful Performance with Multivariate Biomarkers Using Advanced Algorithms”
- Jessica Marquez, NASA Ames Research Center, Silicon Valley, California, “Enhancing Performance and Communication for Distributed Teams During Lunar Spacewalks”
- Shu-Chieh Wu, San Jose State University Research Foundation, California, “Lessening the Impact of Interface Inconsistency Through Goal-Directed Crew Operations”
- Erika Rashka, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, “Local Psychiatric Digital Phenotyping for Isolated, Constrained, and Extreme (ICE) Environments through Multimodal Sensing”
- Ana Diaz Artiles, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station, College Station, “Dose-response Curves of Cardiovascular and Ocular Variables During Graded Lower Body Negative Pressure in Microgravity Conditions Using Parabolic Flight”
- Theodora Chaspari, University Of Colorado, Boulder, “A Speech-Based Artificial Intelligence System for Predicting Team Functioning Degradation in HERA (Human Exploration Research Analog) Missions”
- Ute Fischer, Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta, “Supporting Collaboration and Connectedness in between Space and Ground at Lunar Latencies”
- Xiaohong Lu, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, “Space Exposome Converges on Genotoxic Stress to Accelerate Brain Aging and Countermeasures to Mitigate Acute and Late Central Nervous System Risks”
- Catherine Davis, Henry M. Jackson Foundation For The Advancement of Military Medicine, North Bethesda, Maryland, “NeuroSTAR (Neurobehavioral Changes Following Stressors and Radiation): Predicting Mission Impacts from Analogous Human and Rodent Endpoints”
Propositions were individually evaluated by subject professionals in academic community, market, and federal government utilizing a double confidential peer-review procedure to evaluate clinical benefit. NASA evaluated the leading scoring propositions for significance to the company’s human research study roadmap before last choices were made.
____
NASA’s Human Research Program pursues the very best approaches and innovations to support safe,