BLOOMINGTON, Ind.– Of the 3 transfers Indiana tempted from previous Pac-12 schools in the offseason, the very best understood is unquestionably center Oumar Ballo. He dipped into prominent Arizona, and he bet the Hoosiers throughout the 2022-23 season.
The other 2 gamers– guards Myles Rice and Kanaan Carlyle– weren’t as noticeable. Carlyle, a minimum of, dipped into Stanford, which tends to get more routine season nationwide tv looks than Rice’s previous school, Washington State.
The Cougars, left in the death of the Pac-12 in addition to Oregon State, seldom get television time, even when they’re excellent. That held true last season when Wazzu went 25-10 and ended up second in the last season of the Pac-12. Washington State made it to the 2nd round of the NCAA Tournament before losing to Iowa State.
Some Indiana fans may have seen Rice play, however few. Contrasts to previous Indiana gamers come in helpful.
The only issue? Rice, prepared for to be a point player for the Hoosiers, played that position as his primary function at Washington State, however he didn’t play it solely. While he led the Cougars at 3.8 helps per video game, Washington State did not think twice, sometimes, to let among its other guards start action.
That alters the stats somewhat to bring some combination guards from Indiana’s past into the prospect swimming pool. That makes this contrast a bit more enjoyable.
One method which Rice does not compare to anybody else coming off their freshman season? He is 21. Before his college profession started, he needed to recuperate from cancer. Rice went through chemotherapy after he was identified with a type of Hodgkin lymphoma.
Here are some freshmen from Indiana’s past who produced like Rice did for the Cougars last season.
Tale of the tape
Rice’s conventional stats: 14.8 points, 2.7 rebounds and 3.8 helps at Washington State. He transformed 43.9% of his shots and 27.5% of his 3-point efforts. He is noted at 6-foot-2 and 175 pounds.
Rice’s innovative stats, as utilized by sports-reference. com: Rice had 3.8 win shares and a 17 Player Efficiency Rating. He had a 25.9% use portion, a 22.7% help portion, a 5.4% overall rebounding portion and a 2.4 defensive box plus-minute ranking.
A few of the innovative stats are described listed below.
Respectable reference
An overall of 11 previous Hoosiers certified as analytical contrasts for Rice, however just a couple of them deserve reference.
Steve Alford ’84 is close in standard statistics to Rice. The Indiana legend balanced 15.5 points, 3.2 helps and 2.6 rebounds in his very first Indiana season. The contrast falls apart when shooting is taken into account. Alford transformed 59.2% of his two-point shots and was a fatal 3-point shooter when he played in video games where it existed. Rice had a hard time because department.
Luke Recker ’98 isn’t away in production,