Perspectives > > Wired Practice– Ron Harman King fears health care reform might depend upon the courts, not Congress, at terrific expense
by Ron Harman King, JD, MS, Contributing Writer, MedPage Today January 5, 2025
-
Ron Harman King is CEO of Vanguard Communications, a health care marketing and practice management seeking advice from company, and author of “The Totally Wired Doctor: Social Media, the Internet & & Marketing Technology for Medical Practice.”
In this video, health care marketing specialist Ron Harman King, JD, MS, analyzes the stunning assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and its causal sequences through a currently unstable American health care system.
Following is a records of his remarks:
Now that the 2024 governmental election is over, we must not be so stunned about the result as much as the discovery that a variety of previous Bernie Sanders fans chose Donald Trump this election year.
What a stunner that numerous Sanders sectarians included for Trump out of the very same disappointments with the status-quo gentility Sanders has actually attacked for several years. Or not.
Right before the election, a New York Times/Siena College survey discovered that more than 3 of 5 most likely citizens think “the federal government is mainly working to benefit itself and the elites”– whoever those ill-defined elites might be.
Weeks later on, this suppressed rage emerged most significantly in action to the December 4th murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. The assassination– an act of afraid terrorism, to be sure– is another pointer that nobody appears to like insurer beyond their executives and shareholders.
Clients dislike business insurance coverage for rejections, hold-ups, and permanently broadening deductibles and co-pays. Companies hate it for administrative oversight and administrative headaches.
Within 48 hours of the killing, social networks boiled over with poisonous posts backing the slaying. By one account, UnitedHealthcare’s main Facebook declaration about the murder got 46,000 responses, of which 41,000 reacted with the laughing emoji.
When it comes to the health care occupation, look no more than MedPage Today newspaper article, essays, and reader remarks to see an ocean of virulent anti-insurance belief. The bitter profusion raises the concern of whether the country is approaching an all-but-unthinkable possibility: the next episode of significant health care reform.
Remember the last reform, the 2012 passage of the Affordable Care Act [ACA]Understood as Obamacare, the ACA was not so much health care reform as health care insurance coverage reform intended at making protection more budget-friendly.
Flash forward more than a years. For a more sweeping reform of the insurance coverage market, another Congress should either resolutely take sweeping action, or a high federal court would need to release a landmark choice in a controversial and extended claim.
For motivation, let us aim to historic precedent. One circumstances may be the 1982 separation of the Bell telephone system. (Anyone keep in mind the telephone business?)
An 8-year legal fight by the U.S.
